Mac Visser vs Ole Bredschneijder Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent form, Visser has a slightly better second serve performance, winning 41.11% of points compared to Bredschneijder's 40%. What does this mean for their likelihood of winning upcoming matches? The second serve performance is often key in tight contests.
• Bredschneijder has a stronger return game lately, winning 50% of their opponent's second serve points, surpassing Visser's 47.02%. Does this indicate an edge for Bredschneijder? Assuming returns continue at this pace, they seem to have the upper hand.
• In terms of breakpoint savings under pressure, Bredschneijder again has a slight advantage, saving 47.5% compared to Visser's 45.76%.
• Throughout the last year, Visser has won a greater percentage of matches overall at 53.85%, while Bredschneijder stands at 50%. Does win percentage paint a favorable picture for Visser? It provides a marginal edge.
• On clay, Visser has a career win rate of 55%, indicating strong performance on this surface. How does this compare to their performance on other surfaces? On Hard courts, they have an unsuccessful record, with no wins recorded.
• Bredschneijder also shows subpar performance on Hard courts, with a 0% win rate.
• Visser has faced lower-ranked opponents on average, 261.46, compared to Bredschneijder's average opponent rank of 91.69. Would playing higher-ranked players be favorable for improvement? It suggests Bredschneijder is more familiar with tougher competition.
• If the match extends into a deciding set, Visser's record is favorable, winning 67% compared to Bredschneijder's 0% in deciding sets.
• Visser and Bredschneijder display comparable breakpoint conversion rates recently, with Bredschneijder having a slight edge at 38.71% to Visser's 38.24%.

Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance patterns and key statistics, Visser demonstrates a slight superiority in overall match win percentage and second serve performance. However, Bredschneijder compensates for this with stronger return game statistics.

While Visser excels in deciding set scenarios, the impact of Bredschneijder's experience against higher-ranked opponents cannot be underestimated. Considering the surface, Visser favors clay, yet performance on hard courts remains uncertain for both players.

Taking all these factors into account, Bredschneijder's recent form in return games and ability to handle stronger contenders could tilt the balance in their favor.

Thus, Bredschneijder seems more likely to emerge victorious in this tennis match.